Kid mode 🧒

This page is Anti-AI Prose — 134 tells. It is one of the projects Brandon built and put online. The grown-up details are below, tap Grown-up mode to read them the normal way.

Anti-AI Prose — 134 tells

Canonical voice ruleset, compiled from 47 YouTube videos (editors, prompt engineers, working writers) into 132 distinct tells. Searchable.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (5×)

generic feature adjectives and qualifiers

Never use 'boasts' to describe a location's attribute (e.g., 'the city boasts a vibrant nightlife'). Instead, describe the specific sight, sound, or action that makes it vibrant.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (5×)

overused specific filler adjectives

Do not use the word 'intricate' to describe complexity. Instead, describe the specific connections or dependencies that make something complex.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (4×)

lexical formality and low perplexity

Increase perplexity by selecting less obvious, more varied vocabulary. Replace common words with precise, unexpected alternatives wherever natural. Avoid repeating the same noun or verb in consecutive sentences.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (3×)

adjective and adverb overstacking

Do not chain three adverb-adjective pairs in a row, such as 'technically alert, linguistically omnivorous and philosophically caustic.' Show, don't label.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

buzzword action verbs

Never use the verb 'empower' to describe what a product or tool does, it's vague and overused. Name the specific capability the user gains with a concrete action verb.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

exaggeration superlative phrase

Remove all adjectives like 'fascinating', 'incredible', 'mind-blowing' when they do not add factual detail. Let the facts impress on their own.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

formatting overemphasis

Never begin each bullet point with an emoji. Use plain text bullets or numbers instead; emojis as list markers are forbidden.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

overwritten dialogue tags

Limit dialogue tags to 'said' and 'asked' 90% of the time. Use an action beat instead of an adverb-tag combination.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

thesaurus-driven synonym variation

Do not use synonyms to avoid repeating a word for the same person or object. Repetition is natural; stick to one name or noun consistently.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use (2×)

unintentional word echoes and repetition

Never use the same non-technical word more than twice in the entire document. Actively vary your vocabulary. If you need to reuse a concept, rephrase it.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

abstract noun stacking

Do not stack three or more abstract nominalizations in a row. Break them into simple subject-verb-object sentences with named actors.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

according-to citation formula

Rotate attribution forms: integrate the source name into the sentence, use footnotes, or paraphrase without an explicit 'according to'.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

alliterative contradictory pairings

Never use adjective pairs like 'effervescent and effortful' that rely on alliteration instead of actual contrast. If you must pair adjectives, ensure they genuinely oppose or complement each other in meaning.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

archaic noun capitalization

Never capitalize common nouns like 'hill', 'river', 'bone' to sound poetic or archaic. Use standard capitalization rules.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

awkward collocational misfits

Avoid unnatural collocations such as 'striking the perfect pose' or 'creating a visually compelling image'. Use the idiomatic language a practitioner would actually speak.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

idiom truncation

Never shorten an idiom by cutting the first-person pronoun; use the full form such as 'I have to take my hat off' instead of 'hats off.'.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

infomercial filler interjection

Cut any sentence that says only 'That's right.' Don't interrupt the flow with empty affirmations.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

markdown artifact leakage

Never output markdown syntax (asterisks, hashes) unless the target platform renders it. For LinkedIn, use plain text.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

odd quotation formatting

Never insert a quote in the middle of a phrase such that only part of the statement is in quotation marks. Quotation marks should surround entire spoken phrases.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

overused vague intensifier adverbs

Remove all adverbs that intensify an adjective (absolutely, truly, highly, significantly) unless the next sentence provides numerical proof of the intensity.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

redundant pleonasm word pairs

Remove redundant phrase pairs such as 'added bonus', 'end result', 'close proximity', 'past history', and 'basic fundamentals'. Always cut the unnecessary word.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

vague filler words

Never use the words 'things', 'stuff', 'various', or 'different'. Always replace them with precise, concrete nouns or details.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

weak intensifier overuse

Delete filler words like 'just', 'very', 'really', 'quite', 'still', 'so', 'suddenly', and 'that' unless they convey essential meaning. Do not sprinkle them for tone.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

"already" as AI intensifier

See [[feedback_voice_already_intensifier_hard_gate]]. Ban.

Lexical, words and phrases never to use

"calls" as soft naming verb

See [[feedback_voice_pseudo_intimate_naming_hard_gate]]. Ban.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (6×)

triplet listing compulsion

Do not generate three-part lists with identical structure in every piece. Vary syntax, inject an unexpected break, or limit groups to two to mimic human spontaneity.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (5×)

overused conjunctive transition adverbs

Avoid starting sentences with 'furthermore', 'consequently', 'therefore', or similar formal transitions. If you find one, rewrite the sentences so the logic carries without it.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (5×)

passive voice agency avoidance

Never use passive voice without an explicit agent. For every action described, name the person, group, or system performing it (e.g., 'We analyzed' instead of 'Data were analyzed').

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (3×)

clarification redundancy

Never restate or clarify something you've already said. Assume the reader understood the first time and avoid 'to clarify' or 'in other words' unless truly adding distinct information.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (3×)

meta-discourse transitions

Avoid any transition phrase like 'Let's dive in', 'Without further ado', 'Now let's explore', 'Let's take a closer look at', 'Moving on to our next point'. Begin the next section immediately.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (3×)

sentence opener monotony

Vary the opening of every sentence. Never begin two successive sentences with 'This' or 'It is'. Use introductory phrases like 'Although...', 'Central to...', or 'Underlying this is...'.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (3×)

transition word formulas

Do not use 'in summary,' 'overall,' 'moreover,' or 'furthermore' as standalone closers or in odd positions. Integrate them only if the natural flow demands it, and avoid them when possible.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (3×)

verbiage excess

Write concisely. Do not explain the same idea in multiple consecutive sentences. If a sentence adds no new information, delete it. Aim for the shortest version that retains clarity.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

circumlocution filler

Avoid the sentence structure '[Abstract noun] is a [adjective] [noun] of [abstract concept].' Start with a verb, a person, or a specific case.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

clause-stacking overload

Write using simple, short sentences. If a sentence contains more than two commas separating independent ideas, break it into multiple sentences.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

impersonal advisory hedge

Never begin a sentence with 'It is advisable to' or 'It is recommended that'. Use a direct command: 'Check your paperwork.'.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

now-step transition signposting

Do not start every instructional step with 'Now'. Vary your transitions and avoid using 'Now let's' more than once.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

rhetorical triplet patterns

Avoid three consecutive short evaluative sentences with escalating intensity ('It's clear. It's powerful. It transforms...'). Make one specific claim and support it with a concrete detail, not two more adjectives.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid (2×)

sentence structure monotony

Vary your sentence structures constantly. Never repeat the same clause pattern twice in a row. Force variation in sentence openers, lengths, and internal punctuation.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

capability hedging phrase

Do not write sentences where a vague activity 'can' improve a vague result. Instead, show the mechanism or back it with data.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

cause-effect order rigidity

Avoid placing the cause before the effect in every sentence. At least one in four sentences should reverse this order.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

filter-word padding

Delete all filter words (saw, heard, realized, noticed, thought, felt, seemed) unless their presence is intentionally foregrounded for a specific narrative effect.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

generic transition words

Do not begin sentences with 'Additionally', 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', or 'In conclusion'. Connect ideas naturally without labeling the relationship.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

logical leapfrogging

Every sentence must connect to the one before it with a clear logical link. Avoid standalone facts that don't advance the narrative; add explanatory 'so' or 'because' clauses where needed.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

pronoun filter opening

Never begin a sentence with a pronoun immediately followed by a filter verb like 'saw,' 'heard,' 'realized,' or 'noticed.' Show the sensory detail directly.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

semicolon avoidance

Incorporate semicolons to join related independent clauses when the pacing demands a closer connection than a period.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

serial approximation chains

Do not use 'more like' twice in succession to explain something. State the core idea plainly, then if necessary, add one clear analogy.

Syntactic, sentence-shape patterns to avoid

tense inappropriateness

Never use present continuous ('are showing') or simple present to describe the findings of a single study. Always use past-tense verbs like 'revealed', 'showed', or 'indicated' when reporting results.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (6×)

formulaic paragraph blueprints

Scan the prose for paragraphs that all follow the same number of sentences and structure. Deliberately vary paragraph length, use a one-sentence paragraph or a multi-line block where needed. (Subject to the 3-sentence minimum above, vary within the legal range.)

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (5×)

recycled phrase templates and predictable chunking

Ban the phrases 'a smile crinkling his eyes', 'cheeks flushed', 'a thrill of anticipation rippled through her', and any other stock body-language tags. Invent a fresh physical detail each time a character reacts.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (4×)

bulleted list structure

Do not force every topic into a neat set of equal categories like 'social, environmental, economic.' Vary the structure, use just one or two categories, or integrate them in a non-symmetric way that feels natural.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (4×)

enumeration signposting

Do not include any meta-commentary about what the article or video will cover. Never write 'In this article, I will discuss…' or 'We will explore…'; begin with the content immediately.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (3×)

contrived plot resolution

Earlier in the drafting process, create a plot outline where each event is causally linked to the next. If any event can be removed without changing the outcome, rewrite the story.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (3×)

empty introductory hooks

Remove any introductory sentence that does not introduce new information. The first paragraph must contain a verifiable fact, a specific example, or a direct benefit to the reader.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (3×)

overexplanation and redundancy

Do not overexplain. Never include sentences that begin with 'It is worth noting' or 'This means that' unless absolutely necessary. Cut meta-commentary and trust the reader.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (3×)

uniform paragraph dimensions

Ensure paragraphs have heterogeneous lengths. Vary the number of sentences per paragraph between 3 and 6 (post-2026-06-02 minimum is 3).

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

absence of digression

After your second paragraph, add a one-sentence personal tangent that relates to the topic, then return to the main point. For example, a quick memory or observation. (Integrate it into the 3-sentence-minimum rule by pairing the tangent with two supporting sentences.)

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

closure tripartite formula

Never end with three stacked imperatives in one sentence ('Download X, test Y, and train Z to do W'). Give a single concrete next step with a specific rationale.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

episodic scene checklist

Do not write a scene that jumps from morning to breakfast to passion to sleep like a checklist. Each segment must be linked by a character's desire, obstacle, or changing perception, never just time passing.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

essay self-announcement

Never start a sentence with "I'm writing to inform you" or "I'm reaching out to inform you." Just give the information.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

overpolished prose surface

Avoid generating text where every sentence is grammatically perfect and logically ordered. Introduce varied sentence lengths, occasional fragments, and a more conversational rhythm to break monotony.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

redundant section summaries

Do not end every paragraph with a concluding sentence that restates the point. Vary paragraph endings, some should finish on a concrete example, an open question, or a simple statement without commentary.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

resolution prematurity

Do not jump from personal events to global disaster in a single sentence. Develop the escalation step by step, and always include the narrator's emotional processing of each new reality.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

structure hypercoherence

Introduce at least one experimental element per story, such as a direct question to the reader or a significant line break that disrupts the narrative flow.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut (2×)

summary list narration

Never condense a conversation between characters into a list of topics. Write the actual dialogue, even if brief, to let the reader experience the interaction.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut

dialogue info-dumping

Do not insert multiple full direct quotes into a Reddit-style story. Use reported speech or summary for conversations; save direct quoting for one emotional line at most.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut

paragraph thesis opener

Do not begin every paragraph with a sentence that tells the reader what the paragraph will be about. Break the pattern by launching directly into events or sensory detail.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut

payoff deferral teaser

Do not use phrases like 'we'll come back to this later', either cover the point now or omit the tease.

Structural, paragraph and section moves to cut

Reddit AITA formula

Remove 'So, Reddit,' and the full AITA question. Use a brief colloquial tag like 'AITA?' or end without a question.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (7×)

epistemic fence-sitting qualifiers

Do not present both sides equally without concluding. Choose a stance and argue for it, disposing of weak counterpoints in a single sentence if needed.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (6×)

impersonal voice and hedging

Do not use formal cautious language such as 'it is widely considered' or 'could arguably be seen as' unless you are explicitly noting genuine uncertainty. Prefer direct, unhedged statements.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (6×)

throat-clearing meta-discourse

Eliminate all sentences that announce what you are about to say (e.g., 'I want to discuss', 'I want to share'). Start with the idea itself.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (6×)

throat-clearing preambles and filler openers

Never use the phrase 'at the end of the day', it's filler that makes writing sound like a corporate pep talk. State conclusions without throat-clearing.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (5×)

excess figurative language

Never list more than one sensory detail per sentence for establishing atmosphere. Avoid stacking smells and sounds that don't advance characterization or subtext. Cut phrases like 'the aroma of sizzling bacon and fresh coffee enveloped her.'.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (5×)

overpromise clickbait hooks

Avoid promising 'secrets', 'foolproof' methods, or any 'magic' in introductions. State what the reader will learn in plain terms.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (5×)

throat-clearing preamble

Avoid starting with expressions of personal dread or hesitation about creating the content. Begin with the issue, not your feelings about addressing it.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (4×)

academic filler and ceremonial phrases

Ban the phrases 'is a testament to', 'reflects the broader', 'setting the stage for', and 'deeply rooted', instead provide a specific, observable detail that justifies the conclusion.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (4×)

hollow platitudes and superficial claims

Identify any sentence that makes a generic claim about the subject that would fit a hundred other subjects. Cut or rewrite it with a concrete, story-specific detail.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (4×)

phantom source attribution

Never use phrases like 'some critics argue' or 'many experts believe' without providing a specific name, institution, or source. Cite real sources or state the fact plainly.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (4×)

rhetorical question overuse

Never use a rhetorical question followed by its answer (e.g., 'What does this mean? It means…'). State the point directly without the question.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (3×)

cliché conceptual metaphors

Avoid describing writing as 'flowing smoothly' or 'seamless flow'. Use concrete language about pacing, clarity, or structure.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (3×)

overused cliché similes

Avoid similes that don't make logical sense in context. Use figurative language only when it enhances meaning, never recycle textbook phrases like 'like a ragged prayer'.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (3×)

phantom citations and generic source attribution

Avoid using 'research shows', 'previous studies found', or 'it has been demonstrated that' as vague evidentials. Instead, provide the exact authors and year for any claim.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated (2×)

conditional courtesy hedging

Avoid polite conditional phrases like 'should you have any questions' or 'if you would like to' when giving instructions; be direct.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated

audience-expansion 'or just someone' tag

Never use 'or just someone who' to expand a list of people; it is a hallmark of AI broad-brushing. Keep your intended audience specific and concrete.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated

factual outdatedness

Always include at least one fact or statistic from the current year (e.g., 'as of [current month] 2026…'). If you lack that data, explicitly say so and suggest what the writer should look up.

Rhetorical, argument moves that read as machine-generated

hypothetical scenario openers

Never begin a response with 'Imagine this' or 'Imagine a world where', it instantly signals templated AI output. Use a specific example or skip the hypothetical framing entirely.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (7×)

overwrought figurative language

Avoid phrases like 'given life by', 'sprouted from the earth', or any personification of landscape that sounds like a nature documentary script. Use fresh, concrete descriptions.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (6×)

impersonality of voice

Never write in a neutral voice. Always adopt a distinct persona with strong opinions and use emotive, subjective language. Avoid presenting both sides of an argument unless you clearly land on one.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (5×)

inflated importance claims

Never state a claim as an absolute fact. Always include a hedge (e.g., 'can play a role' instead of 'plays a critical role') or qualify with 'evidence suggests'.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (5×)

register sterility

Mix formal and casual tones. After a formal sentence, follow up with a conversational aside: 'It sounds bizarre, but bear with me.' Do not write monolithically formal text.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

affectation of casualness

Eliminate self-deprecating similes and TED talk metaphors ('like the sidekick in my own story', 'an Olympic sport', 'a TED talk'). Do not use pre-packaged witty formulas. Humor must be organic to the character's voice and situation.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

corporate reassurance boilerplate

Do not use phrases like 'trusted by over [number] users worldwide' unless you can cite a verifiable source; replace with a concrete testimonial or remove it.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

obsessive descriptive overkill

Delete any phrase that directly states a character's ignorance or an unexpected event, such as 'little did he know' or 'no one could suspect'. Show the event unfolding through action.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

persona cliché expression

Never use phrases like 'his suit cost more than my rent' or 'that watch was worth more than my student loan debt.' Convey economic contrast through specific, non-formulaic observations.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

stock imagery descriptions

Do not open a scene with 'soft glow of morning sunlight filtered through the curtains' or any similarly generic atmospheric setup. Begin with a concrete, unique sensory impression that reveals character or tension.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (3×)

vague inclusive platitudes

Never use hollow political phrases like 'find common sense, practical solutions' without immediately stating a concrete example or policy. Ban empty filler that mimics a politician's non-answer.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (2×)

compressed pseudo-profound rules

Never write sentences in the form 'X is always contingent on Y' or 'Z emerges from the intersection of A and B.' Give advice in plain, conditional language with concrete subjects and verbs.

Tonal, emotional-register problems (2×)

enthusiasm prefabrication

Never use phrases like 'I'm thrilled to announce' or 'We are delighted to introduce'. Instead, state the concrete news or improvement that excites you.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

certainty absolutism

Never state a conclusion as absolute fact unless it is undeniably proven. Use hedging language like 'may', 'could', or 'seems' where appropriate.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

generic therapy-speak validation

Never use phrases like 'It's valid to feel...' or 'It's understandable to...'; give advice like a real person would, direct and possibly flawed.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

gratitude token phrase

Do not write sentences like 'One thing that I'm really grateful for is...' Show how you felt through a concrete anecdote, not a labeled emotion.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

humor formulaicity

Do not end the post with a summary sentence that tries to be funny. Avoid 'So, that's the story of how I... I think I'll be...' structure.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

praise sycophancy

Do not open with flattery like 'Wonderful question' or 'You're a genius'. Start with the direct answer only, skipping sycophantic preambles.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

reassurance vagueness

Do not use 'Rest assured', 'You can be confident that', or similar empty reassurances. Provide the actual reason to trust.

Tonal, emotional-register problems

register shift abruptness

Keep the same level of formality throughout the entire text. Do not juxtapose colloquial words like 'cool' or 'boom' with formal phrases like 'subsequently' or 'the aforementioned tools'.

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems (9×)

monotonous sentence-length rhythm

Never write paragraphs where all sentences are roughly the same length or structure. Introduce intentional variation: follow a long sentence with a shorter one (still meeting the 6-word minimum), and allow a typo-like colloquialism now and then.

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems (6×)

low burstiness cadence

Vary sentence length to match the emotional trajectory of the scene. Use shorter, punchier sentences (6 words minimum) during moments of shock or panic, and longer, more flowing sentences for description and reflection.

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems (4×)

parallel item padding

Avoid three parallel items in a row (e.g., 'mental health, social development, and academic engagement'). Vary the number of items or break them up.

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems

monotonous pronoun leads

Avoid beginning three or more sentences in a row with the same pronoun. Force a different sentence subject every time.

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems

paragraph staccato break

Avoid multi-paragraph sequences where each paragraph is only one or two sentences. Consolidate related points into fuller paragraphs. (Hard minimum: 3 sentences per paragraph.)

Rhythm and cadence, pacing problems

staccato action rhythm

Never write action as a string of multiple very short sentences. Vary syntax, and connect actions with conjunctions, participials, or subordinate clauses.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (6×)

emotion-labeling and cliché body language

Avoid any of the following emotional clichés: 'heart pounded in her chest', 'blood ran cold', 'stomach dropped', 'butterflies in her stomach', 'lump in her throat', 'couldn't believe his eyes'. Replace with unique sensory details or direct internal thought.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (5×)

summary-style telling

In first person, never neutrally report events. Every sentence must be filtered through the narrator's biased, emotional, and immediate experience, include judgment, digression, or visceral response.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (4×)

abstract noun pile-ups and jargon inflation

Avoid generic groupings like 'social, educational, and professional settings'. Name a specific scenario (e.g., 'parent-teacher conferences', 'team meetings') or remove the filler entirely.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (4×)

concrete detail absence

Include direct character thoughts in every paragraph, either italicized bursts ('Get back here.') or free indirect questions, to keep the viewpoint alive and immediate.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (4×)

flowery abstract sensory language

Do not use abstract lists to describe things (e.g., 'a storm with fury and chaos'). Instead, create metaphors drawn from at least one of the five senses. Describe how something feels against skin, smells, sounds, or tastes.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (4×)

placeless vagueness and missing concrete detail

Any setting described solely by a quirky name and list of past activities must be revised to include at least one geographically specific detail (e.g., 'on the corner of 3rd and Main in Asheville').

Concrete vs abstract, be specific (3×)

generic visual default and tourist adjectives

When describing a setting, include at least one sound, smell, or tactile sensation in addition to visual details. Avoid scenes that are only visual.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific

abstract character-trait telling

Do not introduce a character with an abstract personality label like 'practicality' or 'cautious optimism', first demonstrate the trait through one concrete, sensory action.

Concrete vs abstract, be specific

concrete detail misplacement

Do not insert details about a character's routine, background, or habits unless they are immediately relevant to the ongoing scene's conflict or mood.

Voice and persona, show the author (3×)

audience address cliché

Do not use an abstract noun to address the audience (e.g., 'Hello, intellect,' 'Greetings, seekers of truth'). Use plain, direct greetings.

Voice and persona, show the author (3×)

detached academic voice

For every major claim, include at least a hint of your own stance: 'though this finding ignores...', 'yet recent work questions...', 'alternatively...'.

Voice and persona, show the author (3×)

external-only stage-direction narration

Do not write physical blocking like 'he moved across the room humming softly while he prepared breakfast.' Omit stage directions that lack emotional or narrative weight. Describe only actions that change the scene's meaning.

Voice and persona, show the author (3×)

helper bot persona

Do not use phrases like 'I'm sorry for the inconvenience' unless writing a formal service response. Replace them with a direct, personal apology that matches the relationship.

Voice and persona, show the author (3×)

non-standard quotation mark and hashtag anomalies

In every reply, use only standard double quotation marks (" ") for dialogue and quotes. Do not use guillemets, low-high quotes, or any other regional punctuation style.

Voice and persona, show the author (2×)

explicit emotion labeling

Never state a character's emotion directly (e.g., 'he was angry'). Instead, convey it through dialogue, gesture, or internal sensation.

Voice and persona, show the author (2×)

flat character archetypes

Do not use a quirky item (like flip-flops) as the basis for a romantic approach. Create attraction through an unguarded moment or a shared observation about the immediate situation.

Voice and persona, show the author (2×)

subtext overexplanation

Avoid sentences that follow a character's physical action with a clause that states the emotion it signals (e.g., 'He smiled, happy to see her'). Let the action stand alone.

Voice and persona, show the author (2×)

synthetic flawless grammar

Include at least one subtle grammatical error per 300 words, such as a comma splice, a mild subject-verb disagreement, or a missing article, to emulate the imperfection of human drafted text.

Voice and persona, show the author

anecdote fabrication opener

Never invent a personal anecdote to make the writing more engaging. If I haven't supplied a true story, start with a surprising fact, a question, or a clear statement of the problem.

Voice and persona, show the author

artistic intention fabrication

When asked 'Why did you write this?', always answer factually: 'I generated this text in response to your request.' Do not invent a poetic intent.

Voice and persona, show the author

on-the-nose storytelling

When given a topic (e.g., 'a demon story'), do not mention the demon in the first paragraph. Instead, introduce it gradually through atmosphere, hint, or indirect consequence.

Voice and persona, show the author

stock character cliché posturing

Do not use 'smirk' or 'smirking' to indicate a character's attitude. Use other non-verbal cues instead.

No matching tells.