Or was any one silently rendered with the Lester XTTS clone, the way two earlier _sourceaudio files (wpUCkqhE8v4, mihAR69tVtc) turned out to be?
Speaker-identity embedding, the gold standard for this yes/no question. Reference separation creator vs Lester = 0.596 (well apart). Green bar = similarity to creator, rust bar = similarity to Lester.
| Render | creator | Lester | margin | owner |
|---|
Timbre and channel, not pure speaker identity. Same ranking, creator wins every row, but the margins are thin (0.010 to 0.017), which is exactly why Method 1 is the one the verdict rests on.
| Render | creator | Lester | margin | owner |
|---|
wpUCkqhE8v4_chalkboard_LESTER_clean.mp4). A 60s window at t=60s was scored for each render.
The chiron-video-tracker tencard rows for all 8 carry the truthful chiron-sourceaudio-… route and no Lester label. The task said "fix Voice Owner + badge if wrong." Nothing was wrong, so nothing was flipped. Reference: feedback_chiron_tracker_strict_voice_and_render_rules.
verify_v3_resemblyzer.py + verify_v3_report.json (deciding run), verify_v2.py + verify_v2_report.json (MFCC), the two reference wavs, and eight <slug>_60s.wav clips. Local audit page, not deployed.